THE EMPTY IDEOLOGY....

---

The Liberal Mirage and Africa’s Quest for Decolonised Thought

Postcolonial Africa’s encounter with liberalism remains one of the most paradoxical inheritances of decolonisation. Upon the euphoria of independence, states such as Nigeria, Ghana, Senegal, and Cameroon did not merely inherit arbitrarily drawn borders and brittle institutions; they also assimilated an epistemic architecture — liberalism — whose genealogy was distinctly European. Originating from the crucible of Enlightenment rationalism and bourgeois revolutions, liberalism translated Europe’s historical struggles against ecclesiastical absolutism and monarchic sovereignty into universalist dogma. It advanced a quasi-soteriological faith in individual autonomy, market rationality, and constitutional democracy as the telos of civilisation. Yet the transplantation of this ideology into African polities — whose moral worlds were animated by communalism, relational personhood, and cosmological cohesion — proved a grievous disjuncture.

Liberalism’s implantation in Africa was never merely ideological; it was a continuation of imperial tutelage refracted through new idioms of “freedom” and “development.” Kwame Nkrumah, in Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism (1965), excoriated this subtle architecture of domination: beneath the ornamented lexicon of rights, markets, and multipartyism lurked a sophisticated circuitry of control sustained by the IMF’s fiscal prescriptions, the World Bank’s austerity diktats, and the epistemic hegemony of Western education. The liberal state thus became a simulacrum of sovereignty—ornamented with constitutions and elections yet tethered to external capital and normative dependency. Frantz Fanon, anticipating this pathology, warned in The Wretched of the Earth (1961) that political independence without ideological autonomy merely reconfigures subjugation into mimicry. The postcolonial citizen was declared free but remained ensnared in the invisible lattice of economic conditionalities and cultural deracination.

Contemporary African polities reveal the hollowness of this liberal experiment. “Elections” persist as ritualised performances of consent, often preordained by elite compacts rather than authentic popular volition. Nigeria’s electoral crises, Kenya’s post-election violence, and Zimbabwe’s cyclical manipulations expose democracy’s degeneration into an aesthetic of participation devoid of substantive empowerment. Similarly, economic liberalisation—celebrated as the royal road to growth—has metamorphosed into a mechanism of dispossession. The structural adjustment regimes of the 1980s pulverised the public sector, commodified subsistence, and deepened pauperisation. What was heralded as “free market efficiency” became a euphemism for transnational extraction masked by developmental technocracy.

The tragedy, however, transcends mere governance failure; it emanates from a civilisational misalignment. Liberalism’s anthropological premise—the self-maximising, rights-bearing individual—stands in ontological contradiction to Africa’s relational humanism. As articulated by John Mbiti’s celebrated dictum, “I am because we are,” and Ifeanyi Menkiti’s communitarian ethics, African personhood is not a natural datum but a moral achievement, conferred by communal recognition and ethical participation. The Akan, Igbo, and Yoruba traditions inscribe personhood within a continuum of social obligation and moral reciprocity; autonomy is not emancipation from others but flourishing through others. The liberal exaltation of atomistic liberty, by contrast, fragments the moral texture of community and desacralises the social essence of being.

This epistemic clash permeates political and economic norms alike. Liberal adversarialism—manifest in the majoritarian model of electoral competition and the commodification of land as alienable property—subverts traditions that privilege harmony, stewardship, and deliberative consensus. Kwasi Wiredu’s notion of “consensus democracy” recuperates precolonial modalities of decision-making that valued unanimity over victory and dialogue over domination. Ubuntu, similarly, rearticulates the political in the grammar of compassion and solidarity, proposing restorative rather than retributive justice as the foundation of social order. Julius Nyerere’s Ujamaa socialism and Thomas Sankara’s radical self-reliance projects sought to inscribe economic sovereignty within the matrix of African communal ethics—though often sabotaged by the structural violence of global capitalism.

To decolonise political thought, therefore, is not to indulge in nostalgic archaism but to perform an epistemological insurgency — a recovery of Africa’s capacity to theorise itself. Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o’s Decolonising the Mind (1986) designates this as the struggle against intellectual captivity — the need to think in our own categories, to name our realities in our own tongues. Achille Mbembe’s On the Postcolony (2001) extends this imperative into the terrain of conceptual sovereignty: Africa must cease to be an object of imported theory and emerge as a subject of world thought.

A decolonised African political imagination would neither repudiate liberalism wholesale nor uncritically enshrine ancestral orders. It would instead orchestrate a creative synthesis — a pluralistic democracy rooted in consensus rather than adversarial; an economy balancing initiative with solidarity; a jurisprudence intertwining rights with responsibilities; and a sovereignty both dialogical and self-determining. Such an intellectual reclamation transforms political philosophy from mimicry into invention — a movement toward Africa’s own idioms of justice and equality. The task, as Wiredu insists, is not imitation but translation: to wrest universalism from its Eurocentric enclosure and re-inscribe it within Africa’s moral, cultural, and historical continuum. Only then can democracy in Africa cease to be ceremonial theatre and become the lived embodiment of collective human dignity.

---

VOCABS FROM THE PASSAGE - 

1. Epistemic – Related to knowledge, its sources, limits, and justification (how and what we know).​

2. Genealogy – The historical development or origin-story of an idea, practice, or institution.​

3. Dogma – A set of principles or beliefs laid down as authoritative and not to be disputed.​

4. Telos – The ultimate aim, end, or purpose toward which something is directed (from Greek philosophy).​

5. Simulacrum – An image, imitation, or façade that copies something while lacking its underlying reality or substance.​

6. Pauperisation – The process through which individuals or societies are made poor or pushed into destitution.​

7. Ontology / Ontological – Concerning the nature of being and existence; dealing with what kinds of things fundamentally exist.​

8. Atomistic – Viewing individuals as isolated, self-contained units rather than as essentially relational or interconnected.​

9. Adversarialism – A mode of politics or law structured around conflict and opposition between competing sides.​

10. Deliberative – Related to careful discussion, reasoning, and consideration before making collective decisions.​

11. Stewardship – Responsible management and care of something (like land or resources), often on behalf of a community or future generations.​

12. Archaism – A tendency or proposal to return to old, outdated, or ancient ways, ideas, or forms.​

13. Insurgency (used metaphorically as “epistemological insurgency”) – A rebellion or uprising; here, a radical challenge to dominant ways of knowing.​

14. Deracination – Uprooting people or cultures from their native context, traditions, or identity.​

15. Pluralistic – Characterised by diversity of groups, viewpoints, or values coexisting within the same political or social order.

 SOURCE- AEON ESSAYS

WORDS COUNT- 600  

F.K SCORE- 18