-

Art for the Senses: Why Textural Modern Paintings Create Deeper Emotional Resonance.



The initial encounter with a painting is often ocular—a convergence of colour, composition, and subject. Yet certain modern works resist confinement to the visual, compelling the observer toward deeper sensorial participation. Such paintings, textured in both form and feeling, extend an unspoken invitation: to approach, to perceive the tactile vitality of raised pigment, and to intuit the surface as profoundly as the image. This embodiment of texture transforms perception into a near-physical experience, grounding the aesthetic in corporeal sensibility.

At Mojarto, the philosophy of art transcends ornamentation; art is conceived as a synesthetic dialogue, uniting sight and sensation, intellect and affect. Textural modern paintings embody this dialogue—works that solicit not mere admiration but engagement. Through layered materialities—impasto, knife-stroke, or mixed media—the viewer’s eye deciphers touch through vision alone, generating an illusion so potent that the mind simulates contact. This cerebral hapticity induces a more intimate psychological and emotional communion, making texture an instrument of affect.

The potency of texture lies in its paradoxical duality: its capacity to suggest movement within stillness, chaos within composure. Raised surfaces refract light irregularly, reshaping mood throughout the day; shadows insinuate themselves into crevices, delineating contrasts between serenity and fervour. Thus, in textured abstraction or layered montage, emotion is not observed but encountered. The artwork becomes alive, oscillating between form and formlessness, inviting interpretation not as spectatorship but as participation.

Neuroaesthetic inquiry affirms that this tactile illusion stimulates distinct neural circuits, blending the perceptual with the proprioceptive. When one confronts a textured canvas, the experience ceases to be passive—vision becomes embodied, the artwork acquiring a quasi-animate agency. Such paintings inhabit a dual ontology: as visual discourse and as material presence that transforms spatial atmosphere. Whether in domestic or professional interiors, the works transmute inert surfaces into living topographies of sensation, producing aesthetic environments rather than mere decoration.

Contemporary Indian artists on Mojarto extend this sensory frontier by experimenting with pigments, materials, and relief. Employing vellum, sand, or metallic foil, they construct liminal surfaces that capture fugitive light and temporal flux. Each composition thus evolves beyond image into event—a transaction between matter, light, and gaze. For collectors, these paintings are singular, irreproducible entities, defying digital replication and accruing both emotional and monetary value through their material authenticity.

Admittedly, the mediation of texture through digital imagery poses challenges; however, Mojarto mitigates this through high-resolution documentation and curatorial detail, enabling viewers to imagine tactility even at a remove. Once installed, the physical artwork reinstates its full phenomenological charge: surfaces breathe, shadows shift, and the piece perpetually redefines its relationship with the surrounding light and architecture.

To display textural art effectively is to choreograph perception—illuminate obliquely to accentuate relief, situate generously to afford spatial resonance, and pair with minimalist décor to amplify contrast. Each contextual decision frames the artwork as a dynamic interlocutor within the room rather than a static object upon it.

Ultimately, textured modern painting functions as an antidote to visual fatigue in an era of pixelated immediacy. It restores the slow, sensual rhythm of encounter—an art that insists on presence, tactility, and contemplation. For Mojarto, these works epitomize the continuum between art and life: sensory experiences that speak not solely to the eye but to the embodied consciousness, where vision, touch, and emotion converge into enduring aesthetic awareness.

VOCABS FROM THE PASSAGE                                          


  1. Corporeal – Relating to the body; physical rather than spiritual or abstract.

  2. Synesthetic – Involving the blending of different senses (e.g., seeing sound, feeling color).

  3. Hapticity – The quality of being perceptible or imaginable through touch.

  4. Proprioceptive – Related to the awareness of one’s body position and movement.

  5. Ontology – The philosophical study of being, existence, or reality.

  6. Neuroaesthetic – Concerning the study of the neural basis of aesthetic experience.

  7. Phenomenological – Pertaining to the direct experience of things as they appear to consciousness.

  8. Temporal – Related to time or the passage of time.

  9. Interlocutor – Someone who takes part in a dialogue or conversation, often as an active participant.

  10. Continuum – A continuous sequence or range where adjacent elements differ slightly but extremes are distinct.


SOURCE- MOJARTO MAGAZINE

WORDS COUNT- 650

F.K SCORE- 17





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

-
Image
                                     FEEL PHILOSOPHY  Empathy and sympathy, though habitually conflated in colloquial usage, are in fact conceptually discrete, each rooted in fundamentally divergent affective architectures predicated upon the notion of affections. Affections, as opposed to passions, are volitional, immaterial mental states-deliberate cognitive-emotional phenomena such as enthusiasm, resentment, or forgiveness-that serve as the substrate for both empathy and sympathy. Passions, by contrast, are involuntary, corporeal responses-manifestations of the body’s reflexive engagement with stimuli, such as the pain experienced upon contact with a hot surface. These passions are unbidden and somatically anchored, whereas affections are consciously willed, persisting as attitudes or dispositions within the mental domain. This bifurcation between passions and affections is pivotal: em...
Read more
-
Image
  Introverts are excluded  unfairly in an extraverts’  world Life as an introvert presents ongoing challenges, particularly in environments designed for extraverts, from open-plan offices to networking at crowded conferences. Unlike shyness, which stems from the fear of negative judgment, introversion is characterized by a strong preference for quiet and less stimulating surroundings, as first conceptualized by Swiss psychoanalyst Carl Jung in the 1920s. Jung described introverts as individuals who direct their energy inward, processing thoughts and feelings privately, while extraverts channel their focus outward and thrive on social interactions that invigorate them. This distinction, deeply embedded in contemporary psychology, is no longer seen as a strict dichotomy but rather as a continuous spectrum—one of the Big Five personality traits . Hans Eysenck, building on Jung’s work in the 1950s, introduced a physiological perspective, suggesting that extraverts possess a...
Read more
-
Image
               How Geometry Revealed Quantum Memory                                 Mathematics, often dismissed in the secondary curriculum as a dry exercise in rote manipulation—arithmetic, elementary calculus, the perfunctory introduction to vectors and probabilities—rarely reveals its true profundity to the uninitiated. The pedagogical focus on computational facility, with only the occasional glimpse of proof or abstraction, fails to capture the labyrinthine depth and counterintuitive beauty that emerges when one transcends the confines of school mathematics. It is only upon immersion in higher mathematics that the edifice of one’s prior understanding collapses, exposing a terrain where logic and imagination entwine, and where the boundaries between mathematics and physics dissolve into a seamless continuum. The physics curriculum, by contrast, tantalizes young mi...
Read more